INTERVIEW THREE DATE: OCTOBER 11, 2012
INTEVIEWED: AMATOGA JÉRÉMY INTERVIEWER: Jefferson Caicedo
Place: Universidad Del
Valle- Melendez Length: 14:25
Min. Hour: 11: 44am
Jefferson: Good morning.
Amatoga: Good morning
Jefferson: Nice to meet you. Thank you for
accepting this interview.
Jefferson: Amatoga is a Fulbright -scholarship -holder and she is majoring in Spanish
and Literature. She is from USA and this
semester she is going to be with us helping us in our projects here at the
Valle University.
Jefferson: Today we are going to talk about this book written by Ray Bradbury,
called Fahrenheit 451. This book was
published in 1953 and this semester we are reading it and I would like to
outline, to point out some interesting aspects about the book that I
found.
Jefferson: I would like to begin asking one question: No accept to knowledge can be assumed as
another way to enslave people, is it possible to perceive this.
Amatoga: Well, considering that I did not grow up in the Colombian context and I
don’t have enough/any historical or political background, and, on the topic I’m
going to speak generally about this. So,
do I think that…um ignorance or the lack of enlightenment can be assumed can be
used to enslave people? Yes I do because it has been done. In the American context during the American
slavery um African-Americans were no permitted to read to, to may how to read,
to may how to write; therefore, they did not have access to books or education. The education system for Africa-Americans
slaves started in 90th early 20th century. And so yes I do think that it can be used to
enslave literally, so when it comes to the Colombian context. And, metaphorically speaking unn it wherever
see inaccessibility to books, unn or a lack of education can be used to kind of
sedific, right. To make them ----------,
to make them afraid of---------------------------or thinking critically about
their world and about their life because when you read it opens up your
imagination and introduces you to-------- views.
Jefferson: What you said is really interesting.
I would like give or to say to what extend or how can we perceive this? Can you give some examples about it nowadays? (Particularly?) How people is being put
away from the access to knowledge, how people is been forbidden the access to
knowledge.
Amatoga: OK. For example umm at TAX University
since the 1960s, there have been students who’ve been trying to fight for an
African studies department. An African
studies department allows for all students to kind of having alternate view of
how the world works. So everything is forming American U.S. central point of
view. For example when you learn about
ancient history or is not about ancient history now. But this will be a very
good opportunity for students about civilization in the East. Asian civilization, as well as African and
central Asia, some Russia and other places.
And finally, we’ll see that the African-American department has been
established but during the period when we didn’t have it, it was…it was
inaccessibility to certain kinds of knowledge because the university did not
want to challenge the status quo. They wanted to keep the curriculum the
way it is because once you start learning that ancient reason room was not----------------right.
What happens? You feel like
someone has been lying to you and that you’ve deceived. So that’s, that’s a very confused
example. Also books banning still
continues in the United States. There
are list of censured books. (Jefferson): OK,
don´t move ahead form the topics, (Amatoga:
It just was to give two examples) thank you, thank you so much.
Jefferson: And the other question I would like to ask you is: Books are a mean to
acquire knowledge; can we conceive a world without books? And how would be that
world, without books?
Amatga: And can we in our ----- position
conceive other worlds without books? No, but do a world without book exist? Yes;
and does a world without books continue to exist? Yes, because there are many umm
nations, groups of people all
of the world who still depend on oral traditions and they do not write
their names down and if they do, some of them on hieroglyphics for instance. And paintings and drawings, ------and other
things that we consider art work but it’s actually…. Even in South America,
descendants of the Mayans, Incas, Aztecs, use key books umm they use other forms
of umm, umm (communicating)
communicating and convening for meetings.
So is this hard to believe? No because there are people who still live
in this place; but, but us in academia, can we consider another world without
books? No because we never had to leave-----.
Jefferson: OK. Thank you.
I’m looking for one excerpt from the book…uhm, here. Eeh.
On page 125, I would like to quote something that the author says here. He says.
“Well, the world can get by just
without them” (referring to the books).
So Bradbury himself, I think that I don’t know; what’s your opinion
about this excerpt. Maybe he is
considering that the world we live can get by without books or is eh a way to
criticize the way…because as you know… I know you got to what the book is
about. And in the book they burn
books. It’s the main topic of the
book. Someone states here “Well, the world can get by without them” (referring
to the books). What is your point of
view?
Amatoga: Um… Well, Is that a very hard question to ask, especially considering
that Bradbury talked himself. So out
from high school he didn’t do college ------- it. And so He spent all his time
in the public library; and so books were very important in his life. And…I think that… I think that we will be
able to get by without books. Why?
Because there is enough of us that already have knowledge from the books that
we’ve already read and we can convey orally, but I also think that if there is an ephemeral time where
we do not have books anymore, we still have enough to read and still think that people will
read in secret. So we avoid the accessing of books
---- to them? I don’t think so.
Jefferson: OK. The last question I would
like to talk about is: Having
information is a mean to have power, to control and influence others, in which
way can we notice this? How can we
notice this ah, ah…way to control to influence others using the information or
the knowledge? If you cn… I mean, generally or because…as we talked before; you
are not very deep in Colombian context.
Amatoga: Yeah. For example, un, yeah,
for…Hun and I can’t be in context (Yeah
but you can be more general) yeah. Umm, it’s
like a----- assumptions to me.
Assumptions about------…… Well, OK! So here how students and what higher
education does, that it gives you the knowledge to be able to do more with your
life. So when you go to college you need
enough in order to have a
regular job; it’s like you’re not going to for instance, so tricky industry after
college. That is unusual ---what you to do, but you go one/want to be you know a
business man, you’re going to be a doctor, you’re going to be a politician --- you
know smarter who
researchers or things like
that/who think li
that; and so what happens is that we… information that you have, the
majority of the Colombians don’t. So for
instance when you think on a politician, or doctor, or a researcher wherever
knowledge that you produce, people tend to believe you and you can control
their mind in that way, right, because they don’t hove… For the most part, I’m
not talking about individuals but for the most part, they don’t have the information
to challenge you, right, but you do. So
we who are here; even though we don’t have the-----------, we still hold the
right to power because of what we know.
What we know how Colombian government, Colombian politics and
society. That, the…Majority of people don’t
know, right? So I guess that could be an example.
Jefferson: It’s been said that, that eh… This
information you are talking about uhm… Sometimes… We, we already talked about,
the lack of ... there, the no accept to the information or the knowledge but at
the same time there’s am, sometime there is a lot of information that can get
you distracted. It’s another topic that
the author touches here in the book. So
I would like to quote uhm… one excerpt from the book…… OK. Here, OK. He says “Betty
yet give him none. Let him forget there
is such a thing as war. If the
government is inefficient, top-heavy, and tax-mad, better it be all those than
that people worry over it. Peace
Montag. Give the people contests they
win by remembering the words to more popular songs or names of state capitals
or how much corn Iowa grew last year.” So here the author is talking about
how sometimes the government or the system use the power or the information to
control or put a lot of information just to get people distracted or get
concentrated in aspects that are not really such important. What your opinion about this?
Amatoga: Well, I mean beside ----- mind the politicians, I mean it’s just a
matter of the context, but I’m sure that you, your---- has heard uhm, ah … you
may have listened to another’s president campaigns for instance. Maybe other political leaders; and they
distracted with the bunch of statistics, they distract with things that are
going to be, but they never tell you what they’re actually doing, or how are
they’re actually solving the problem, but they’re throwing other information ------
so thus you get lost in the information, right.
Uhm… what else? Advertisements for products. Is very pretty the product, you know you’re
gonna distracted by oh my God! It’s like if I… you know, I drink these pills. I guess I’ll be skinny for instance and then you tend to forge
the like whole problems that are associated; that’s just like an example. So I mean in the Colombian context if/I think people will be
most important will be like politics and how politicians distract you with all
this information and they
don’t believe on/they will be done.
Amatoga. Thank you a lot for a
lot for your time, for accepting this interview and hope to meet you in the
future time.
Amatoga: Thank you for having me, bye everyone.
No comments:
Post a Comment